Legal Opinion
Hard v. Hollywood Turf Club
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1952No. Civ. 18750PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The Hollywood Turf Club by a writing engaged appellant to remodel and renovate its grandstand by removing two floors of a section and by reconstructing three floors. For the purpose of executing its contract, appellant let 21 subcontracts with the approval of the club and employed 125 men for the general work. The Arenz-Warren Company had the subcontract to do the painting and it-employed a superintendent and two foremen besides workmen. Respondent was one of the painters. On December 15, 1947, he was at work on a defective scaffold when it collapsed and precipitated him 40 feet causing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- DeHaen v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of MassachusettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Dahms v. General Elevator Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Snyder v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kuntz v. Del E. Webb Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.