Legal Opinion

Counihan v. Lufstufka Bros. & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1931No. Docket No. 7592PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

While attempting to cross a street in Oakland plaintiff was struck and injured by an automobile driven by the defendant Beran; and she brought this action for damages against him and his co-defendant Lufstufka Bros. & Company (a copartnership) claiming that the accident was caused by the negligent operation of the automobile and that said copartnership was liable therefor under the doctrine of respondeat superior. A motion for nonsuit was granted as to the copartnership, and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. The question presented for determination is,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Hiner v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API