Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Deramus

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 2003No. 1012372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Christopher Deramus, petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's judgment dismissing Deramus's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Deramus v.State, (No. CR-00-2420, August 16, 2002) ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2002) (table). We granted certiorari review.1 For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

We adopt the statement of facts set forth by this Court in Exparte Deramus, 882 So.2d 875 (Ala. 2002):

"Christopher Deramus was convicted of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Conners v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte ConnersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Deramus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API