Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Conners

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 2002No. 1010939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Houston, Lyons, Johnstone, and Woodall, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Horsley v. HorsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Coughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003