Ex Parte Conners
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).
WRIT DENIED.
Houston, Lyons, Johnstone, and Woodall, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Horsley v. HorsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Coughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003