Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Deramus
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 21, 2003No. 1012372Published
1Opinion of the Court
882 So.2d 878 (2003)
Ex parte Christopher DERAMUS.
(In re Christopher Deramus
v.
State of Alabama).
1012372.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
March 21, 2003.
Christopher Deramus, pro se.
Andrew W. Redd, general counsel, and Jane LeCroy Brannon, asst. gen. counsel, Department of Corrections, for respondent.
LYONS, Justice.
The defendant, Christopher Deramus, petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's judgment dismissing Deramus's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Deramus v. State, (No. CR-00-2420, August 16, 2002)…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Conners v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte ConnersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.