Legal Opinion
Conners v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided November 30, 2001No. CR-00-1074PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
837 So.2d 319 (2001)
Charles E. CONNERS
v.
STATE of Alabama.
CR-00-1074.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
November 30, 2001.
Rehearing Denied January 25, 2002.
Charles E. Conners, pro se.
Andrew W. Redd, general counsel, and William F. Addison, asst. gen. counsel, Department of Corrections, for appellee.
2Per curiam
On October 5, 2000, Charles E. Conners filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he alleged that he was denied due process when he was removed from work release and reclassified as a "heinous offender" based on a change in the criteria of the Department of Corrections for determining…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Jolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Smelcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003