Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Culver

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1888No. 13,289PublishedCited by 55 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first paragraph of the appellant’s claim or complaint alleges that the appellant’s intestate, Sarah Rohler, owned a large amount of personal property; that she was of unsound mind at the time of her death, and that the appellee’s intestate, Moses C. Culver,wrongfully appropriated, under a fraudulent contract, that personal property.

The second paragraph of the complaint alleges that Sarah Rohler was, for a long time prior to her death, the owner of •one hundred and ten acres of land; that she was of unsound mind; that Moses C. Culver undertook to manage the property, and that he collected…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Whitney v. AllaireNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Brown v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Blume v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API