Matter of Cieminski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
All five appellants are mentally retarded wards of the state residing at Faribault State Hospital. New commitment petitions were filed for each appellant pursuant to legislative mandate. After full evidentiary hearings, at which each patient was represented by counsel, all were committed back to Faribault. The patients appeal the commitment orders. We affirm.
FACTS
Deanna Cieminski is profoundly retarded and non-verbal. She is 26 years old and has resided at Faribault for 12 years. She lacks gross and fine motor control and requires a high degree of nursing care.
Paul…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of WicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of HarhutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Swenson v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of BlilieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Matter of FredericksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of KellorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Matter of SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of BlilieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.