Legal Opinion

Matter of Cieminski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1985No. C7-85-1021 to C4-85-1025PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

All five appellants are mentally retarded wards of the state residing at Faribault State Hospital. New commitment petitions were filed for each appellant pursuant to legislative mandate. After full evidentiary hearings, at which each patient was represented by counsel, all were committed back to Faribault. The patients appeal the commitment orders. We affirm.

FACTS

Deanna Cieminski is profoundly retarded and non-verbal. She is 26 years old and has resided at Faribault for 12 years. She lacks gross and fine motor control and requires a high degree of nursing care.

Paul…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of WicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Matter of HarhutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Swenson v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of BlilieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Matter of FredericksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Matter of KellorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Matter of SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Matter of BlilieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API