People v. Stratton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial, and from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The appellant was charged on information, tried and convicted of the crime of incest, and appeals from the judgment, from the order denying him a new trial, and from the order denying his motion in arrest of judgment.
1. The information charged that the defendant “did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously have sexual intercourse with Nina E. Stratton, a female child, she, the said Nina E. Stratton, being then and there the daughter of the said W. S. Stratton, ’ ’ etc. It is said that the charge of felonious “sexual intercourse” is not within the purview of our statute, which declares (Pen.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- State v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
- Porath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. KaiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Lusby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.