Hallenberg v. Hallenberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From an order of the probate court for Clay county, Sharp, J., denying the petition of Carl A. Hallenberg to have the fact of his restoration to capacity judicially determined, petitioner appealed to the district court for that conuty where the appeal was heard before Boeser, J., who made findings and reversed the order of the probate court. The motion of Oscar Hallenberg for amended findings was denied.
Read the full summary
From an order of the probate court for Clay county, Sharp, J., denying the petition of Carl A. Hallenberg to have the fact of his restoration to capacity judicially determined, petitioner appealed to the district court for that conuty where the appeal was heard before Boeser, J., who made findings and reversed the order of the probate court. The motion of Oscar Hallenberg for amended findings was denied. From the order denying his motion for a new trial, Oscar Hallenberg, guardian, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In March, 1917, Carl A. Hallenberg was adjudged incompetent to care for and manage his property, and his son was appointed guardian of his father’s person and estate. Two months thereafter, Hallenberg petitioned the probate court to be adjudged competent. The petition was denied, and he appealed to the district court where, after an exhaustive trial, a decree was entered reversing the probate court and determining that Hallenberg then was and had always been mentally sound and competent to care for his person and property. A motion for amended findings or a new trial was denied. The guardian…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Guardianship of DahmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Hartmann v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- In Re Guardianship of StangerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Dahmen v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934