Legal Opinion

Marvis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 2001No. 1994-99PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, HOLLAND, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERYEY and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

Appellant was convicted of murder pursuant to Tex.Pen.Code § 19.02(b)(1). The jury found two enhancement paragraphs *879to be true and assessed punishment at seventy-five years confinement.

A panel of the court of appeals held that the evidence was legally insufficient to support appellant’s conviction of murder as a principal,1 but that the evidence was both legally and factually sufficient to support appellant’s conviction of murder as a party. Marvis v. State, 3 S.W.3d 68, 70-6 (Tex.App.—Houston…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Marvis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

4Cited by63 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. McKinney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. Swartz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  4. Fowler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  5. Reedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API