Legal Opinion

Marvis v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 21, 1999No. 14-96-01562-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED MAJORITY OPINION

DON WITTIG, Justice.

Appellant, Zerick Marvis, pled not guilty to the offense of murder. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (Vernon 1994). He was convicted, and finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the jury assessed punishment at seventy-five years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. In two multifarious points of error, appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction as a principal and as a party and asserts fundamental charge error and prosecutorial misconduct. We reverse…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Marvis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Rivera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  5. Reedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API