Rosencrans v. Modern Woodmen of America
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the 'district court for Sarpy county: Harvey'D. Travis, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHamer, J.
The defendant and appellant, Modern Woodmen of America, is a corporation and a fraternal beneficiary association. On the 8th day of October, 1892, it issued a benefit certificate to Charles H. M. Rosencrans, the husband of the plaintiff. The certificate provided that on the death of ;sai'd Charles H. M. Rosencrans the defendant would pay to • Mary A. Rosencrans, the plaintiff herein, the sum of $2,000. The plaintiff and her husband resided at Papillion, Nebraska. For a considerable time prior to the 9th day of September, Í903, the husband was working as a carpenter for Swift & Company, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Modern Woodmen of America v. GerdomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Harrington v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Magness v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Whiteley v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patrick v. Union Central Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Banks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Wells v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Munson v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Fredrikson v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.