Legal Opinion

Wells v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1936No. 29477PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is a suit at law by the widow of an employee of the Union Pacific Railroad Company upon a group insurance policy issued by the Equitable Life Assurance Society. The jury returned a verdict for $1,660.97, being one year’s wages of deceased. The insurance company appeals.

Samuel F. Wells, aged 47 years, was a steamfitter, and worked for many years for the Union Pacific Railroad Company at Omaha. A group insurance policy was secured and held by the railroad company upon all its employees, and a simple certificate based thereon was issued to each employee.

Mr. Wells gradually developed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yates v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McLaughlin v. Sovereign CampNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. New York Life Ins. v. BrameMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Warner v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Coe v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecurityNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Howard v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Johns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Banks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Batth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API