Sloan v. Sloan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The respondent has appealed from an order granting a divorce for desertion. As there was no jury trial, it devolves upon us to examine and analyze the record and determine whether the learned court below, who approved the recommendation of the master, reached a correct conclusion concerning the issues involved: Xangeland v. Xangeland, 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 375, 164 A. 816. We recognize that the report of the master, who had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, should be given careful consideration; but it is only advisory and not controlling. We may accept…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nacrelli v. NacrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Langeland v. LangelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lyons v. LyonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Dailey v. DaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Totino v. TotinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Thomas v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Wiley v. WileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Fellabaum v. AlvarezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Hess v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.