Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Dailey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1932No. Appeal 33PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The libel in this divorce action alleges that the respondent, by cruel and barbarous treatment, endangered the life of the libellant and offered such indignities to her person as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome. The lower court sustained the charge relating to indignities and entered a decree for the libellant, finding the respondent guilty of nagging, personal vituperation of his wife and the use of threats and language calculated to humiliate her, absence from home and failure to adequately support his family. There was not any evidence produced…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  2. Aikens v. AikensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Buys v. BuysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Heimer v. HeimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sleight v. SleightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Verbeck v. VerbeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Hepworth v. HepworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Hewitt v. HewittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API