Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 24, 2014No. 52ag/12PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding concerns a Maryland lawyer who failed to: (1) respond to discovery requests or timely propound discovery requests on behalf of her client; (2) timely submit a proposed judgment in compliance with a court order; and (3) respond to Bar Counsel’s inquiries concerning her representation of a client.

Melissa Donnelle Gray (“Gray”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, was retained by Carmen Bustamante (“Ms. Bustamante”) in connection with a divorce case. Ms. Bustamante filed a complaint against Gray with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrigermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API