Legal Opinion

Longshore v. State Ex Rel. Kroell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1917No. 7 Div. 873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County; Lum Duke, Judge. Quo warranto by the State, on relation of P. J. Kroell, against A. P. Longshore, Sr. Judgment of ouster, and respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The state of Alabama, on the relation of P. J. Kroell, files its petition in a quo warranto proceeding calling upon the respondent, A. P. Longshore, to show by what authority he claims to hold the office of president of the board of revenue of Shelby county, and praying that he be ousted therefrom. Besides the formal parts, the petition charges simply that the respondent “has usurped, intruded into, and unlawfully holds, without warrant or authority of law,” the office in question, which is a public civil office of the state of Alabama.

Demurrers to the petition being overruled, respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Knox v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Thomas v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Frost v. State ex rel. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Jackson v. State ex rel. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. State Ex Rel. PeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Jones v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Hale v. State Ex Rel. AlgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Sharp v. State Ex Rel. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Klein v. HuttonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API