Legal Opinion

Jones v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1934No. 6 Div. 390PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

To sustain a bill to vacate the decree of a court of competent jurisdiction for fraud, the bill must allege the facts showing that the fraud was in the concoction or procurement of the decree. This has been held bo include false and fraudulent statements in the petition, which were necessary to invoke the power or jurisdiction of the court to render the decree under attack. Keenum v. Dodson, 212 Ala. 146, 102 So. 230; Kelen v. Brewer, 221 Ala. 445, 129 So. 23; Tolley v. Hamilton, 206 Ala. 634, 91 So. 610; McGathey v. Thompson, 224 Ala. 163, 138 So. 841; Hardeman v. Donaghey,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. McCall v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Taylor v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. C & C PRODUCTS, INC. v. Premier Industrial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Hooke v. HookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. State v. PollockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API