Legal Opinion

Miller v. State Ex Rel. Peek

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1947No. 7 Div. 895PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto (section 1136, Title 7, Code of 1940), instituted in the name of the State on relation of J. L. Peek, and J. L. Peek, individually (section 1142, Title 7, Code), against' Cecil C. Miller, charging him with usurping,- intruding into and unlawfully holding the office of director of traffic and law enforcement, for the city of Anniston, a public office, without warrant or authority of law.

In pertinent part, the complaint alleges:

“3. That the respondent, Cecil C. Miller, has usurped, intruded into and unlawfully holds without…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Matter of Wipfler v. KlebesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. City Council v. National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Little v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hatas v. PartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Ex Parte DarnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Lewis v. Annie Creek Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cherokee County v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Bouldin v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API