Legal Opinion
Ertag v. Haines
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 24, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 225 (1954)
104 A.2d 81
LEO ERTAG, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BERNARD S. HAINES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 24, 1954.
Mr. Benjamin Shanefield, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Jack L. Cohen, attorney for defendants.
GAULKIN, J.C.C.
Plaintiff sues on a book account, assigned to him by Synvar Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for goods sold and delivered by Synvar Corporation to defendants in Monmouth County between January and September 1953.
Defendants admit the receipt of the goods, and the prices, but allege that the goods did not correspond to the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Quick v. LemonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Bluthenthal v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- James H. Rhodes & Co. v. ChausovskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Vaughan v. WOMELDORFSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bd. of Ed., Woodbridge Tp. v. Kane Acoustical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Garnick v. SerewitchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. FiorillaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- DeCOSMO v. ForemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Republic of China v. Pong-Tsu MowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954