Legal Opinion

T. S. Faulk & Co. v. Fenner & Beane

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1929No. 4 Div. 424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

Section 3351 of the Code of 1907 prescribed what should constitute prima facie proof of a violation of the preceding sections. The Legislature of 1915, in order, no doubt, to recognize the Federal Agriculture or Cotton Futures Act (38 Stat. 693), passed the Acts of 1915, p. 913. This court in the case of Levy, Aronson & White v. Jones, 208 Ala. 104, 93 So. 733, held that said act repealed or amended sections 3349, 3351, and 3353 of the Code of 1907. The Code of 1923 (sections 6819, 6820), however, reproduced sections 3351 and 3353, but substituted section 2 of the act for section 3349 as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Gettys v. NewburgerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. Levy, Aronson & White v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Allen v. Caldwell, Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. CurreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alamaris v. Jno. F. Clark & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fenner & Beane v. OliveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Fenner Beane v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Fenner Beane v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Orvis Bros. Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API