Fenner & Beane v. Olive
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The complaint was upon the common counts. The defense rested largely upon the alleged illegality of the consideration; taking the form, to state it generally, that the cause of action arose out of gambling transactions in' cotton futures by the defendant, Olive, The form of pleading this defense, as set up in pleas 2 and 3, by way of illustration, has been approved (Shannon v. McClung, 210 Ala. 273, 97 So. 840; Faulk & Co. v. Fenner & Beane, 221 Ala. 96, 127 So. 673), and while not representing the perfection of pleading, aiid perhaps, from a technical standpoint, subject to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Henderson v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Gettys v. NewburgerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- J. H. Arnold & Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. CurreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Marengo Abstract Co. v. Hooper & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- All States Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Olive v. Fenner & BeaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Orvis Bros. Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Orvis Bros. Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938