Legal Opinion
Fenner Beane v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 16, 1930No. 6 Div. 508PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The question for decision is the refusal of general instructions requested by plaintiff.
The history of the pertinent statutes was adverted to in Levy, Aronson & White v. Jones, 208 Ala. 104, 93 So. 733, and the change of statute to meet that decision indicated in T. S. Faulk & Co. v. Fenner & Beane (Ala. Sup.) 127 So. 673, 1 and in editor’s notes, Code of 1928, § 6819. And the rule of evidence (under section 6819, Code) is thus stated (127 So. 677 2 ): “ * * * Proof of the first part of the section makes out a prima facie case of illegality of all forbidden transactions, but, in order to give…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Hawley v. BibbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- National Bank v. NorthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Browne v. ThornSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Levy, Aronson & White v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alamaris v. Jno. F. Clark & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Fenner & Beane v. OliveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Orvis Bros. Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Orvis Bros. Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938