Legal Opinion

Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants, Mark and Elizabeth Wisniski, t/d/b/a Saturn Surplus (“Saturn Surplus”), appeal from the trial court’s order dated April 18, 2003, granting summary judgment to Defendants/Ap-pellees, Brown & Brown Insurance Co. of Pa. Inc., Donald Blood and Will Rineer (collectively, “the Brown Agency”). Defendants/Appellees, EMC Insurance Companies and Scott W. Ahlstrom, (collectively, “EMC”) appeal a different part of the same order, denying their motion for summary judgment. With respect to Saturn Surplus’s appeal, we reverse and remand. We quash EMC’s appeal.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Taylor v. TukanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Lewis v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. East Liberty Development, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API