Legal Opinion
Kashani v. TSANN KUEN CHINA ENTERPRISE CO.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 2004No. B166041PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Plaintiffs Mir Kazem Kashani, Manoutcher G. Nikfarjam, and Shantia Hassanshahi (collectively plaintiffs) allege in their second amended complaint that they and defendant Tsann Kuen China Enterprise Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation that is the parent corporation or owner of the other named defendants (collectively defendants), executed a written agreement whereby plaintiffs would establish an Iranian corporation in Iran to build a plant in Iran for manufacturing defendants’ computer products to be sold in Iran and elsewhere and would provide defendants with 18 percent of the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Hersant v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Massoud Bassidji v. Simon Soul Sun GoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kelton v. StravinskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. v. Bernards Bros.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- United States v. Hasston, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Hasston, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.