Legal Opinion

Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. v. Bernards Bros.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 2011No. B219199PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

Subcontractor Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. (Pacific), sued its general contractor Bernards Bros. Inc. (Bernards) seeking payment for work performed under Pacific’s subcontract. The trial court granted Bernards’s motion for judgment, ruling, because Pacific did not maintain a class C-12 specialty license, that it was not “a duly licensed contractor” and was hence not entitled to bring its action. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7031, subd. (a).)1 Pacific appeals.

We hold that Pacific was duly licensed because it held a class A general engineering contractor’s license when…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cal-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. County of Colusa v. California Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Judicial Council v. Jacobs Facilities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. E. J. Franks Construction Inc. v. SahotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Pacific Caisson & Shoring v. Bernards Bros. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. E.J. Franks Construction v. SahotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Judicial Council of Cal. v. Jacobs FacilitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API