Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. v. Bernards Bros.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
Subcontractor Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. (Pacific), sued its general contractor Bernards Bros. Inc. (Bernards) seeking payment for work performed under Pacific’s subcontract. The trial court granted Bernards’s motion for judgment, ruling, because Pacific did not maintain a class C-12 specialty license, that it was not “a duly licensed contractor” and was hence not entitled to bring its action. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7031, subd. (a).)1 Pacific appeals.
We hold that Pacific was duly licensed because it held a class A general engineering contractor’s license when…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cal-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- County of Colusa v. California Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Judicial Council v. Jacobs Facilities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- E. J. Franks Construction Inc. v. SahotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Pacific Caisson & Shoring v. Bernards Bros. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- E.J. Franks Construction v. SahotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Judicial Council of Cal. v. Jacobs FacilitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.