Gosliner v. Grangers' Bank of California
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. E. W. Risley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an action for goods sold and delivered. The case was tried before the court without a jury, the defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals therefrom and from an order refusing to grant a new trial.
*226The defendant was a banking corporation, doing business as such in the state of California, with its principal place of business in the city of San Francisco. Its principal business seems to have been, so far as appears in this case, loaning money to farmers to carry on farming operations, taking mortgages on their crops planted and to be planted, teams, machinery, ec cetera,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Clay v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Allen v. San Francisco Wholesale Dairy Produce ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Koeberle v. FriganzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Luft v. ArakelianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Neff v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921