Legal Opinion

Neff v. Redmond

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1921No. Civ. No. 2236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

On April 28, 1916, plaintiff commenced an action in the superior court of Humboldt County against Eugene Woodin and others, as trustees of the California Redwood Shingle Company, a dissolved corporation, for the recovery of $1,928. An attachment was issued in said action and levied upon certain property held as such trustees by said defendants. Thereafter the parties to the action, together with one H. A. Poland, entered into a written agreement whereby it was provided that said attachment should be released and “the mill owned by the defendants and held under attachment herein may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Armstrong v. BarcelouxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Gosliner v. Grangers' Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Post v. City and County BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Fresno National Bank v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abbott v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API