Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided April 25, 1997No. C.A. 14459PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBS, Vice Chancellor.
Pending is the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Theodore J. Mayer (“Mayer”), was found entitled to indemnification for the fees and expenses he incurred in his successful defense of a lawsuit brought against him in Chicago, Illinois. The issue is whether Mayer may now recover against the corporation, Executive Telecard, Ltd. (“Executive Telecard”), the attorneys fees he incurred in prosecuting this Delaware indemnification action to a successful conclusion. For the following reasons I conclude that he is not and that his motion for summary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stifel Financial Corp. v. CochranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- Chamison v. HealthTrust, Inc.-Hosp. Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- VonFeldt v. Stifel Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.