Legal Opinion

Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 27, 2003No. C.A. 19753-NCPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

Plaintiff John E. Fasciana seeks an advancement of litigation expenses from defendant Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”) pursuant to § 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) 1 and the bylaws of EDS. Fasci-ana has filed a motion for summary judgment. EDS has responded with its own cross-motion for summary judgment. 2

The central issue on the motions is the breadth of the term “agent” in 8 Del. C. § 145. In its bylaws, EDS promised to advance litigation expenses to “agents” of the corporation to the extent permitted by § 145. In the actions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Stifel Financial Corp. v. CochranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  3. Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Fisher v. Townsends, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Empire of America Relocation Services, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Kaung v. Cole National Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Danenberg v. Fitracks, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
  5. Senior Tour Players v. GOLFTOWNCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API