Barham v. Rupert Crafton Commission Co.

John I. Purtle, Justice.

At the conclusion of the trial of a tort claim involving an automobile accident the jury returned verdicts for both parties. The trial court reconciled the verdicts in favor of the defendant. Appellant’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial were denied. The argument on appeal is that the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, the court erred in refusing to set the verdict aside and grant a new trial. We do not find reversible error.

The automobile collision occurred at an intersection in Blytheville, Arkansas, on March 2,1983. The…