Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Valco Farms

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1997No. 96-661PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

A cotton crop belonging to appellant Vernon Fisher was damaged by an agricultural chemical that drifted onto his cotton. Mr. Fisher brought an action against appellees, Valeo Farms, Danny McCollum, and Air-Aids, Inc., claiming that their negligence in applying the chemical, 2,4-D, to a rice field belonging to Valeo Farms by cropdusters operated by Air-Aids, Inc., caused damage to appellant’s cotton crop located two miles north of the rice field. The jury returned a verdict finding that appellees were not negligent.

Appellant moved for a new trial alleging that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. UrlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Danzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Ross Explorations, Inc. v. Freedom Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Waste Management of Arkansas, Inc. v. Roll Off Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Casteel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API