Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. Whittington

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1981No. 80-260PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In this action for personal injuries and property damage suffered by the appellants in a traffic collision, judgment for the defendant, Whittington, was entered pursuant to a jury verdict apportioning negligence in the ratio of 60% in Ferrell, one of the drivers, and 40% in Whittington, the other driver. A motion for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was against the preponderance of the evidence, was denied. This appeal is solely from that denial and comes to this court as a tort action. Rule 29 (1) (o).

The case is argued as if the test on review were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. McDonald v. HickmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Smith v. VillarrealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Brady v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Dickson v. Delhi Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. White River Rural Water District v. MoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Kempner v. SchulteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API