Ferrell v. Whittington
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
In this action for personal injuries and property damage suffered by the appellants in a traffic collision, judgment for the defendant, Whittington, was entered pursuant to a jury verdict apportioning negligence in the ratio of 60% in Ferrell, one of the drivers, and 40% in Whittington, the other driver. A motion for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was against the preponderance of the evidence, was denied. This appeal is solely from that denial and comes to this court as a tort action. Rule 29 (1) (o).
The case is argued as if the test on review were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- McDonald v. HickmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Smith v. VillarrealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Brady v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
3Cited by20 opinions
- Butler Manufacturing Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Dickson v. Delhi Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
- White River Rural Water District v. MoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Kempner v. SchulteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.