Legal Opinion

Russell v. Webb

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 11, 1910PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Pope Circuit Court; Hugh Basham, Judge; • The location of a section line is a question of fact. 77 N. W. 601; 31 Mich. 270. The verdict should have been for appellant. 25 Tex. 594; 4 Tex. 38. The verdict is void for uncertainty. 32 Tex. 330; 32 S. W. 1048; 72 Tex. 5; 19 Tex. 148; 5 S. W. 556; 55 S. W. 379; -40 S. W. 345; 107 Ga. 152; 4 Barr 196. It is the duty of the jury to decide the point in issue. 4 How. 131; 32 Ha. 1271; 4 Tex. 492; 100 Me. 342; 16 Tex. 18.…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Pope Circuit Court; Hugh Basham, Judge; • The location of a section line is a question of fact. 77 N. W. 601; 31 Mich. 270. The verdict should have been for appellant. 25 Tex. 594; 4 Tex. 38. The verdict is void for uncertainty. 32 Tex. 330; 32 S. W. 1048; 72 Tex. 5; 19 Tex. 148; 5 S. W. 556; 55 S. W. 379; -40 S. W. 345; 107 Ga. 152; 4 Barr 196. It is the duty of the jury to decide the point in issue. 4 How. 131; 32 Ha. 1271; 4 Tex. 492; 100 Me. 342; 16 Tex. 18. Webb cannot break the adverse possession of the Russells by proving that at some time Russell, Sr., deceased, had said…

1Opinion of the CourtFrauEnthal, J.

This was an ejectment suit instituted by T. J. Webb, the plaintiff below, to recover a small triangular tract of land situated in the west half of the southeast quarter of section two, in township six north, of range eighteen west, in Pope' County. The plaintiff derived title to this' land by inheritance 'back from an ancestor who acquired it in 1853; and he and his ancestors had been since that date in possession thereof, except for a part of the time of the triangular tract in dispute, which for a time has been in possession of defendant and his ancestor. The defendant is the owner of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meier v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Fagg v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  3. Blackshare v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Miller v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  5. Leprell v. . KleinschmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Butler v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Barnes v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Jefferson v. SouterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API