Johnson & Johnson v. Taxation & Revenue Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
1.Johnson & Johnson (Taxpayer) entered into a compromise tax settlement agreement with the Taxation and Revenue Department (Department). The settlement agreement purported to settle all of Taxpayer’s tax liability for all periods before 1991. We address three issues today: (1) whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal; (2) whether the signed settlement agreement between Taxpayer and the Department is conclusive on the parties as to all matters expressed therein even though the agreement did not' receive attorney general approval as NMSA 1978, Section 7-l-20(A) (Repl.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- V.P. Clarence Co. v. ColgateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Rainaldi v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Trujillo v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Ellingwood Ex Rel. Estate Streeter v. N.N. Investors Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Johnson & Johnson v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997