Legal Opinion

V.P. Clarence Co. v. Colgate

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1993No. 20623PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a Texas loan brokerage company violated the registration requirement of the New Mexico Mortgage Loan Company and Loan Broker Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 58-21-1 to -27 (Repl.Pamp.1991), 1 by providing loan brokerage services to individuals in New Mexico without a registration certificate. Plaintiff-appellant V.P. Clarence Company (“Clarence”), a loan brokerage firm without a New Mexico registration certificate under the Loan Broker Act, sued defendants-appellees Henry Colgate and Maureen McGuinness (collectively “Colgate”), New…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. Jonathan M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. CleveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ford v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Delfino v. GriffoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API