Legal Opinion

Johnson & Johnson v. Taxation & Revenue Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1997No. 17279Published

1Opinion of the Court

936 P.2d 872 (1997)

1997-NMCA-030

123 N.M. 190

JOHNSON & JOHNSON and Affiliated Subsidiaries, Appellant,

v.

TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Appellee.

No. 17279.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

March 7, 1997.

Certiorari Denied April 16, 1997.

Curtis W. Schwartz, Timothy C. Holm, Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. Santa Fe, Paul H. Frankel, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, New York City, for Appellant.

Tom Udall, Attorney General, Bruce J. Fort, Special Ass't Attorney General, Taxation and Revenue Department, Santa Fe, for Appellee.

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. Johnson & Johnson…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Carter/mondale Presidential Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API