Legal Opinion

Ceramic Process Co. v. General Porcelain Enameling & Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 16, 1942No. 7860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellee charged appellant with the infringement of all three claims of United States reissue patent to Scott, No. 16,048. The answer alleged invalidity and non-infringement. The court found each claim valid and infringed, and referred the cause to a master for an accounting.

The reissue patent before us expired on November 18, 1941, hence an injunction provided in the decree has terminated. However, appellant is alleged to have infringed the patent on a large scale since 1936, and this is the principal issue presented here. The original Scott patent was issued November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Lever Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Ceramic Process Co. v. Cincinnati Advertising Products Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1951
  2. Canaan Products, Inc. v. Edward Don & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
  3. Richdel Division of Garden America Corp. v. Aqua-Trol Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  4. Stone v. HallanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1951
  5. Wright Aeronautical Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API