Legal Opinion

Stone v. Hallan

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 12, 1951No. Civ. No. 2076Published

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiffs sue the defendants for alleged infringement of Patent No. 2,092, *253659 covering a termite shield issued September 7, 1937 to the plaintiff Albert C. Stone. Another Patent, No. 2,176,598 covering a termite shield issued October 17, 1939 to Alfred A. Tennison and James D. Tennison, also comes into view, as the defendants purport to act as licensees thereunder, but said patent at best is limited to an improvement in the wall attached section of termite shields and may be dismissed without further notice.

The said Stone patent is ruled valid, but a closer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. J. L. Owens Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Vrooman v. PenhollowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. E. H. Bardes Range & Foundry Co. v. American Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API