Legal Opinion
Ceramic Process Co. v. Cincinnati Advertising Products Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 7, 1939No. 1012, 5090PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
These two cases were heard together. Case No. 1012 is a suit in equity for patent infringement. No. 5090 is an action at law for a monetary recovery for royalties which plaintiff therein claims are due it under a license contract.
The Ceramic Process Company, one of the plaintiffs in equity suit No. 1012, is the owner of the legal title to Scott Reissue Patent No. 16,048, the patent in suit.
Solar Laboratories is the exclusive licensee under Reissue Patent No. 16,048 insofar as the same is applicable to stenciling on glass articles. It is joined as a plaintiff in Case No.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Ceramic Process Co. v. General Porcelain Enameling & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Cutting Room Appliances Corp. v. Weatherbee Coats, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
- Cincinnati Advertising Products Co. v. Ceramic Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940