Legal Opinion

Dimensional Communications, Inc. v. Oz Optics Ltd.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 6, 2002No. 2:01-cv-04893PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASSLER, District Judge.

Defendant OZ Optics Limited moves pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) to dismiss the Complaint or, alternatively, to quash service of process on the grounds that such service was insufficient under the Fed. R.Civ.P. 4(h). This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

OZ Optics Limited (“OZ Optics Canada”) is a Canadian corporation having its principal place of business in Ontario, Canada. It has no offices in the State of New Jersey, is not registered to do business…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Koehler v. DodwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  4. Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S. A. L.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
  5. Trump Taj Mahal Associates v. Hotel Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tabb v. JOURNEY FREIGHT INTERNATIONSDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  2. Atwater v. Light Korean Presbyterian Church (In Re Mak Petroleum, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  3. Billi Jo Woods v. Morris Mohawk Gaming Group, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
  4. Delgado v. DE MEDEIROSDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  5. Granger v. NesbittDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API