Legal Opinion

Michael Allen v. Richard Ives

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2020No. 18-35001PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL ALLEN, No. 18-35001 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-00044-HZ RICHARD IVES, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 10, 2019 Seattle, Washington Filed February 24, 2020 Before: William A. Fletcher, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Morgan B. Christen, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher; Dissent by Judge Callahan 2 ALLEN V. IVES SUMMARY* Habeas Corpus The panel reversed the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. John Ham, Jr. v. Warden M. BreckonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. Michael Allen v. Richard IvesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. In re MiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  4. United States v. Adam LivarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. (HC) Alford v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API