Legal Opinion

In re: Marvin Griffin

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 25, 2016No. 16-12012-JPublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE PANEL:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Marvin Griffin has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1)newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed- in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. United States v. Calvin MatchettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  4. In Re: James Howard SamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. In re. Morris Vernell Hires, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API