In re: Marvin Griffin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Marvin Griffin has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1)newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed- in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Calvin MatchettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- In Re: James Howard SamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- In re. Morris Vernell Hires, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.