Legal Opinion
Karen Chades v. Molly Hill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 30, 2020No. 19-70365PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN DENISE CHADES, No. 19-70365 Applicant, v. OPINION MOLLY HILL, Acting Warden, Respondent. Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition Argued and Submitted February 13, 2020 Pasadena, California Filed September 30, 2020 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Jay S. Bybee, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bybee; Concurrence by Judge Collins 2 CHADES V. HILL SUMMARY* Habeas Corpus The panel denied Karen Denise Chades’s application for leave to file a second or successive habeas…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kevin Cooper v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Ex Parte GrossmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- (HC) Bolin v. NewcombDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (HC) Brown v. YatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (HC) Faulkner v. PollardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Fawcett v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (HC) Garcia v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.