Marker v. Greenberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court in a legal malpractice action brought by the surviving joint tenant against the attorney who drafted the deed. By that order the trial court granted respondent Robert Green-berg’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff could not bring the action absent an attorney-client relationship and that the six-year statute of limitations barred the action since the statutory period began to run in 1973 when the alleged negligence occurred. We affirm.
For purposes of this appeal, the facts are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McAbee v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Schreiner v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Joyce Witzman v. Bert M. Gross Phillips & Gross, P.A., Formerly Known as Phillips, Gross & Aaron, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.