Legal Opinion

Schreiner v. Scoville

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 19, 1987No. 86-521PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

Martin Schreiner, a named beneficiary in Mary Eickholt’s will and accompanying codicil, filed this action against lawyer Robert Scoville, alleging his negligence caused Eickholt’s testamentary intent as expressed in those instruments to be frustrated and a bequest to Schreiner to fail. District court granted Scoville’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which any relief could be granted, concluding Sco-ville owed Schreiner no duty of due care under the circumstances alleged. See Iowa R.Civ.P. 104(b). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

■ With…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Barcelo v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Simpson v. CalivasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Michele M. Pitts v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company and Donald SchifferSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API