Beasley v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
In this action upon a fire insurance policy, defendants’ motion for nonsuit was granted. Plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.
The policy required filing of sworn proof of loss within 60 days after the loss, and also required that the insured, when required by the insurer, submit to an examination under oath and produce “all books of account, bills, invoices and other vouchers, or certified copies thereof if originals be lost.” It is conceded that these requirements, if not waived by the insurer, are conditions precedent to an action on the policy. Nonsuit was granted upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. London Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Robinson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- White v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Estrada v. Queen Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bergeron v. Employers' Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National American Insurance v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Chavis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Bumb v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6085, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9956Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996