Legal Opinion

Chavis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1986No. 8513SC809PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of the evidence. Plaintiffs contend that the issues as to whether they complied with the provision of the policy requiring the insured to produce books of account and other documents would be subject to a test of reasonableness, which would necessarily have to be determined by the jury. We disagree.

Plaintiffs’ fire insurance policy is the “Standard Fire Insurance Policy for North Carolina” as provided by G.S. 58-176. The provisions of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Pogo Holding Corp. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Joseph F. Kisting and Anchor Sales Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Happy Hank Auction Co. v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stover v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1987
  2. Fineberg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. First Protective Insurance Company v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. MARTIN v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API