Legal Opinion
Harrison v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 3, 1992No. Civ. No. 92-1108-FRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, Judge:
The matter before the court is the motion of the defendants for change of venue (#9).
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Dessie Harrison, filed this action under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., against the defendants, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), George Kourpias, Larry Downing, and James Johnston, officials of the IAM, alleging claims for sex discrimination.
The IAM maintains its headquarters in the State of Maryland. There are approximately 1,500 local unions affiliated with the IAM located in approximately…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Emmett J. Stebbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Iinsurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Arrocha v. Panama Canal CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Ius v. ButcherDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harrison v. INTERN. ASS'N OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACEDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
- Karsten v. McDougall & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Karsten v. McDougall & SonsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Takkallapelli v. Builders SquareDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995